No more retrospective articles, make them prospective!
Henry Mandell
25. January 2024 23:51
The trains have left the station on these. What about over the next five years?
No use for names
23. December 2023 15:18
Thought it was going to be an article about which ones are a good investment now. Not 6 years ago. But some beautiful pieces here for sure.
Raymond garrlock
23. December 2023 3:32
Absolutely amazing and what great information
Nikolaos Mansolas
23. December 2023 1:37
Seems a good list I don’t think the Cartier will appreciate though yes on all the others .
Paul Stabin
23. December 2023 0:25
Well curated. When great style meets great ROI, very hard to resist.
Milo
22. December 2023 15:47
These are watches that WERE a good value for the money. In 2017.
Dr. David E Miller
22. December 2023 13:02
Interesting and informative article. I’m surprised at the appreciation of the watches as being 200+% in 5-6 years. That said, I’d be interested in a similar article which didn’t focus on just members of the “holy trinity” or pretenders to the throne, even though Omega and Cartier are two of my favorite “bang for the buck” marques! Love for you to depart “off the beaten path” and talk about some lesser known and perhaps more affordable “up and comers!”
Gordon Taylor
22. December 2023 3:05
What does the future hold for a mint 2013 Tudor black bay smiley face in burgany ?
Simon Howson-Green
22. December 2023 1:17
Well, if stating the bleeding obvious counts as good journalism, then this ‘article’ is ok. But, of course, it’s not. It’s lazy, not very well written and not very interesting. I guarantee the vast majority of your base is made up of avid watch collectors who will never own an AP or a Daytona or a Patek. You need to do more to reach out to them. Stop being so obvious and boring.
Thiru Rameshan
21. December 2023 23:31
Grest
Chris
21. December 2023 22:06
Very helpful as I ship for a statement watch.
stuart
21. December 2023 21:54
Article listing watches that are good value and likely to go up in value lists a Daytona, RO & a 5711? What was the point of that? An article with that title needs to contain obtainable watches that might go up in value, or at least won’t lose you your shirt. A Speedy has a place on this list but the rest is lazy nonsense.
Comments
No more retrospective articles, make them prospective!
The trains have left the station on these. What about over the next five years?
Thought it was going to be an article about which ones are a good investment now. Not 6 years ago. But some beautiful pieces here for sure.
Absolutely amazing and what great information
Seems a good list I don’t think the Cartier will appreciate though yes on all the others .
Well curated. When great style meets great ROI, very hard to resist.
These are watches that WERE a good value for the money. In 2017.
Interesting and informative article. I’m surprised at the appreciation of the watches as being 200+% in 5-6 years. That said, I’d be interested in a similar article which didn’t focus on just members of the “holy trinity” or pretenders to the throne, even though Omega and Cartier are two of my favorite “bang for the buck” marques! Love for you to depart “off the beaten path” and talk about some lesser known and perhaps more affordable “up and comers!”
What does the future hold for a mint 2013 Tudor black bay smiley face in burgany ?
Well, if stating the bleeding obvious counts as good journalism, then this ‘article’ is ok. But, of course, it’s not. It’s lazy, not very well written and not very interesting. I guarantee the vast majority of your base is made up of avid watch collectors who will never own an AP or a Daytona or a Patek. You need to do more to reach out to them. Stop being so obvious and boring.
Grest
Very helpful as I ship for a statement watch.
Article listing watches that are good value and likely to go up in value lists a Daytona, RO & a 5711? What was the point of that? An article with that title needs to contain obtainable watches that might go up in value, or at least won’t lose you your shirt. A Speedy has a place on this list but the rest is lazy nonsense.