0 0 votes
Article Rating

Comments

Never miss another comment.
Don't miss
10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nicholas Corbi
9. February 2023 21:28

I should have bought a moon swatch instead of the re deal. After 1 1/2 years of ownership my sapphire sandwich Speedmaster had bee at Omega for 4, going on 5 months, for repair. That is unacceptable. Shame on Omega!

Ricardo Rio
22. March 2023 15:07
Reply to  Nicholas Corbi

Dearb Nicholas, unfortunately I have the same problem. It is surprising how a new watch has to go for repair (a screw has been unscrewed and can be seen through the sapphire glass) while under warranty. I honestly can’t understand this.

Peter Løhde Svarre
26. January 2023 14:30

When you pay too much, you lose a little. When you pay too little, you sometimes lose everything, because the thing you bought was incapable of doing the thing it was bought to do. The common law of business balance prohibits paying a little and getting a lot – it can’t be done. If you deal with the lowest bidder, it is well to add something for the risk you run, and if you do that you will have enough to pay for something better. Regards – Peter

john
16. January 2023 20:33

It ruined an iconic watch by piggy backed with a quartz and plastic junk. The new generation of watch collectors are not that naive and ignorant liked you think so they would not fall for your scam.

James C
12. January 2023 19:30

Quite a Joke. Not worth the Hype.

Roger Bouvrie
11. January 2023 11:59

The moon and apolo watches don’t have a date and are non automatic.
I prefer the Omega’s with this complication.

Sergey
24. January 2023 21:52
Reply to  Roger Bouvrie

The moonwatch do have a date and a moonphase. See caliber 1866.

Tariq Sheikh
26. December 2022 17:10

The idea was a great one: to build up hype and demand for the original Moonwatches, but the execution was lacking. The quality of the product did not marry up to the price point.

Lee Rappeport
21. December 2022 12:04

They did it right!

Admin
chrono24
21. December 2022 12:08
Reply to  Lee Rappeport

Thanks for sharing your opinion with us, Lee!