4.7 60 votes
Article Rating

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
21 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
William David Howell
18. January 2025 0:36

Great info!

Ecurb
15. January 2025 17:45

Very usegul

Eric
15. January 2025 14:20

Very interesting

Mike Lancaster
15. January 2025 13:46

Very useful information

Ionel Munteanu
15. January 2025 11:48

Thanks for the information!!

Hamza Jalingo
15. January 2025 11:44

I have always been apprehensive of this alternative market. It seems I have been missing out.
Thank you so much.

Sachin Mehta
15. January 2025 8:49

Nice info.

Hans van Santen
15. January 2025 8:17

Thanks for the information!!

nada alradadi
15. January 2025 8:15

thank you so much for the information

Dion
15. January 2025 8:09

A highly informative article that highlights some very interesting practices being implemented from the top luxury brands. However, it’s also a great promotional piece for Chrono24.

Richard Tappin
15. January 2025 6:27

Very informative

Nikitas
15. January 2025 5:12

Thanks for the useful information

Amitabh Mukherjee
15. January 2025 3:49

Very insightful

Peter Polverini
14. January 2025 23:44

Well done. One of the better explanations about what the Gray Market is and Is not.

Steve
14. January 2025 22:40

The current stainless steel Daytona with ceramic bezel (ref. 126500LN) officially costs $16,300 (as of December 2024). On the gray market, the model is more than twice as expensive, changing hands for roughly $33,000. The watch’s white gold counterpart with the reference number 126509 is “only” $2,900 more expensive at around $49,800. Not sure about the math?

Elias
17. January 2025 20:07
Reply to  Steve

They are referring to how much more expensive it is compared to retail, not compared to the other model.

Timothy S Richards
14. January 2025 22:32

Great.

Bill
14. January 2025 22:26

Great info.

Robert Lightfoot
14. January 2025 21:48

Superb discussion of the topic.

Howard Zhuo
4. June 2024 13:37

Thanks Mathias for this informative article

Mathias
14. January 2025 10:26
Reply to  Howard Zhuo

Thank you very much for your feedback, Howard. I truly appreciate it.